Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Make sure published messages are acknowledged for play mode" #954

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jhdcs
Copy link
Contributor

@jhdcs jhdcs commented Feb 1, 2022

Reverts #951

@jhdcs jhdcs requested a review from a team as a code owner February 1, 2022 13:25
@jhdcs jhdcs requested review from MichaelOrlov, hidmic and clalancette and removed request for a team February 1, 2022 13:25
@jhdcs
Copy link
Contributor Author

jhdcs commented Feb 1, 2022

PR was merged before CI was run. My fault.

@clalancette
Copy link
Contributor

Just FYI, I'm fine with running CI on the current state of things (not including this revert), and just posting it to #951. If it passes, great, then we can just close this one. If not, we can merge this and then take our time to fix any issues.

@jhdcs
Copy link
Contributor Author

jhdcs commented Feb 1, 2022

That would certainly make things much easier... How do I run CI?

@clalancette
Copy link
Contributor

That would certainly make things much easier... How do I run CI?

You need to log in to https://ci.ros2.org, and run the https://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_launcher/ job with the appropriate options to choose the branch in question, and use the appropriate colcon options. That job will spit out some text that you can copy-n-paste into a comment here.

@jhdcs
Copy link
Contributor Author

jhdcs commented Feb 1, 2022

Do I need special permissions on Jenkins' side? I'm not seeing where to run the job...

@clalancette
Copy link
Contributor

clalancette commented Feb 1, 2022

Do I need special permissions on Jenkins' side? I'm not seeing where to run the job...

Yeah, you need special permission if you haven't been given it before. I'm happy to run this one for you (I'll go do that now), but if you are going to be doing a bunch of development/reviewing on this repository, we should probably talk offline about getting you access.

@clalancette
Copy link
Contributor

OK, CI over in #951 was good, so we can close this out.

@clalancette clalancette closed this Feb 1, 2022
@MichaelOrlov MichaelOrlov deleted the revert-951-topic-add-wait-for-all-acked branch July 13, 2024 07:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants