-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 225
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Parameter handling improvements. #345
Conversation
- Adding set_descriptor. - Using better optional parameters for declare_parameters. - Handling read-only parameters. Signed-off-by: Juan Ignacio Ubeira <jubeira@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Ignacio Ubeira <jubeira@ekumenlabs.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
I don't think it is necessary. It just looked more consistent. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
CI: @wjwwood Errors look unrelated; I think we can proceed with this one. |
Thanks @jubeira! |
Closes #341.
There are some details that still need a bit of attention (see #341 (comment)). The PR includes a proposal for
set_descriptor
as described in the comment.On the other hand, I'd like some input about the optional signature using
Parameter
as input fordeclare_parameter
(see comment). Is it worth implementing it even if it only applies todeclare_parameter
but notdeclare_parameters
?Other than that, this should be ready for an initial review.