Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Avoid pandas >1 #1052

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2020
Merged

Avoid pandas >1 #1052

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2020

Conversation

miguelgfierro
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

With great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart, I submit this PR to avoid our libraries to use pandas >1. This should fix #1045, #1046 and #1047.

If we can't trust in pandas, where is this world going?

Related Issues

#1047
#1046
#1045

Checklist:

  • I have followed the contribution guidelines and code style for this project.
  • I have added tests covering my contributions.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • This PR is being made to staging and not master.

@miguelgfierro miguelgfierro merged commit 63f163e into staging Feb 19, 2020
@miguelgfierro miguelgfierro deleted the miguelgfierro-patch-1 branch February 19, 2020 11:43
@miguelgfierro miguelgfierro mentioned this pull request Jun 30, 2020
Closed
@miguelgfierro miguelgfierro mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@anargyri anargyri anargyri approved these changes

@gramhagen gramhagen Awaiting requested review from gramhagen gramhagen is a code owner

@yueguoguo yueguoguo Awaiting requested review from yueguoguo

@loomlike loomlike Awaiting requested review from loomlike loomlike is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@miguelgfierro @anargyri