Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: run in node before not ready #1029

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 24, 2023
Merged

fix: run in node before not ready #1029

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 24, 2023

Conversation

zombieJ
Copy link
Member

@zombieJ zombieJ commented Sep 24, 2023

close #1026

ref #1027

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 24, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
table ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 24, 2023 1:18pm

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 24, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1029 (2225a18) into master (269ef15) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 2225a18 differs from pull request most recent head 8127fd2. Consider uploading reports for the commit 8127fd2 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1029   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.41%   99.41%           
=======================================
  Files          47       47           
  Lines        4448     4448           
  Branches      561      561           
=======================================
  Hits         4422     4422           
  Misses         26       26           
Files Changed Coverage Δ
src/Table.tsx 99.77% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@zombieJ zombieJ merged commit 65f9ce2 into master Sep 24, 2023
9 checks passed
@zombieJ zombieJ deleted the no-block branch September 24, 2023 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

null value of fullTableRef.current isn't handled before calling getContainerWidth
1 participant