Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: inspect the content when initializing table #1017

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2023

Conversation

bbb169
Copy link
Contributor

@bbb169 bbb169 commented Sep 1, 2023

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 1, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
table ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 1, 2023 10:25am

@bbb169 bbb169 changed the title test: inspect the content when initializing a table with the 'scrollX… test: inspect the content when initializing table Sep 1, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 1, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1017 (374c2db) into master (719d285) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 374c2db differs from pull request most recent head f94d2d8. Consider uploading reports for the commit f94d2d8 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1017   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.29%   99.29%           
=======================================
  Files          47       47           
  Lines        4369     4369           
  Branches      550      550           
=======================================
  Hits         4338     4338           
  Misses         31       31           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@zombieJ zombieJ merged commit 86f5cab into react-component:master Sep 1, 2023
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants