You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm wondering why in the budget optimizer analytical gradients are not used instead of finite difference since they are faster and more accurate. With large dataset finite difference doesn't seem feasible. It seems gradients for adstock and hill isn't hard to calculate in analytical form.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm wondering why in the budget optimizer analytical gradients are not used instead of finite difference since they are faster and more accurate. With large dataset finite difference doesn't seem feasible. It seems gradients for adstock and hill isn't hard to calculate in analytical form.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: