This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 20, 2023. It is now read-only.
Let's Assembly 🦾 #2
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Optimization with useless instruction. |
|
Arithmetic speed comparison |
ashWhiteHat
force-pushed
the
asm-arithmetic
branch
from
bd22dd2
to
31f693a
Compare
Closed
Closed
Merged
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
I am going to introduce assembly to field arithmetic 🤖
The implementation supports
add,sub,mulandsquare,double🐕It will improve the calculation speed dramatic 🦿
I tried to refer the matter-labs one but it didn't work so implement from scratch.
Progress
Optimization
Additive ->
Differential addition chainsMultiplicative ->
Coarsely Integrated Operand Scanning