Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bivariate -logLikelihood plot #98

Open
dqq0404 opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

bivariate -logLikelihood plot #98

dqq0404 opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@dqq0404
Copy link

dqq0404 commented Jun 25, 2024

Hi,
After I did the bivariate analysis and got the plot, I found the -logLikelihood plot seemed wrong.
DEP_vs_AST_z_bivariate
DEP_vs_CAT_z_bivariate
Below are the parameters of the two pictures:
best_vs_min_AIC best_vs_min_BIC best_vs_max_AIC best_vs_max_BIC
0.35 -9.19 0.29 -9.25
0.51 -9.03 7.77 -1.76
It shows that the lowest -logL is inconsistent with the number of shared variants in the first plot.
How to explain it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant