You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
After I did the bivariate analysis and got the plot, I found the -logLikelihood plot seemed wrong.
Below are the parameters of the two pictures:
best_vs_min_AIC best_vs_min_BIC best_vs_max_AIC best_vs_max_BIC
0.35 -9.19 0.29 -9.25
0.51 -9.03 7.77 -1.76
It shows that the lowest -logL is inconsistent with the number of shared variants in the first plot.
How to explain it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
![DEP_vs_AST_z_bivariate](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/155523578/342736611-72e933d8-9c7b-48da-af8f-0226833d4d18.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MjQyODQwNTMsIm5iZiI6MTcyNDI4Mzc1MywicGF0aCI6Ii8xNTU1MjM1NzgvMzQyNzM2NjExLTcyZTkzM2Q4LTljN2ItNDhkYS1hZjhmLTAyMjY4MzNkNGQxOC5wbmc_WC1BbXotQWxnb3JpdGhtPUFXUzQtSE1BQy1TSEEyNTYmWC1BbXotQ3JlZGVudGlhbD1BS0lBVkNPRFlMU0E1M1BRSzRaQSUyRjIwMjQwODIxJTJGdXMtZWFzdC0xJTJGczMlMkZhd3M0X3JlcXVlc3QmWC1BbXotRGF0ZT0yMDI0MDgyMVQyMzQyMzNaJlgtQW16LUV4cGlyZXM9MzAwJlgtQW16LVNpZ25hdHVyZT00MDNmYTExNTY5NmE3ZTk3ZWEyNDcxZWY0ZDU4OTkwOTVkNjFiYjViOWI2YzY1NGYzMTE0ZWE0MDQyNDcyOThlJlgtQW16LVNpZ25lZEhlYWRlcnM9aG9zdCZhY3Rvcl9pZD0wJmtleV9pZD0wJnJlcG9faWQ9MCJ9.wiuJqfQalhJLroLGkoH5JcROF4TpCiQcqX1JgIQvkUM)
![DEP_vs_CAT_z_bivariate](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/155523578/342736625-abf2e8ce-8c0b-401d-8a77-0222832dc64c.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MjQyODQwNTMsIm5iZiI6MTcyNDI4Mzc1MywicGF0aCI6Ii8xNTU1MjM1NzgvMzQyNzM2NjI1LWFiZjJlOGNlLThjMGItNDAxZC04YTc3LTAyMjI4MzJkYzY0Yy5wbmc_WC1BbXotQWxnb3JpdGhtPUFXUzQtSE1BQy1TSEEyNTYmWC1BbXotQ3JlZGVudGlhbD1BS0lBVkNPRFlMU0E1M1BRSzRaQSUyRjIwMjQwODIxJTJGdXMtZWFzdC0xJTJGczMlMkZhd3M0X3JlcXVlc3QmWC1BbXotRGF0ZT0yMDI0MDgyMVQyMzQyMzNaJlgtQW16LUV4cGlyZXM9MzAwJlgtQW16LVNpZ25hdHVyZT1hZjE2MWQ0Nzc3MzEyYzNiNzNmNzNlY2FkMDg4ZDNlMTlmN2VkYzI1ZTQzYTgxYWZhMWU4OWYyNWE0N2RjZWU3JlgtQW16LVNpZ25lZEhlYWRlcnM9aG9zdCZhY3Rvcl9pZD0wJmtleV9pZD0wJnJlcG9faWQ9MCJ9.oKtzZ2UhmzR3iCxL9l42a1FDA61Txm5SInSaL74h-RM)
After I did the bivariate analysis and got the plot, I found the -logLikelihood plot seemed wrong.
Below are the parameters of the two pictures:
best_vs_min_AIC best_vs_min_BIC best_vs_max_AIC best_vs_max_BIC
0.35 -9.19 0.29 -9.25
0.51 -9.03 7.77 -1.76
It shows that the lowest -logL is inconsistent with the number of shared variants in the first plot.
How to explain it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: