Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stop sending response data if connection is closed #349

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion lib/goliath/request.rb
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -214,8 +214,9 @@ def post_process(results)

# Writes each chunk of the response data in a new tick. This achieves
# streaming, because EventMachine flushes the sent data to the socket at
# the end of each tick.
# the end of each tick. Stops sending data if connection has been closed.
def stream_data(chunks, &block)
return if @response.closed?
@conn.send_data(chunks.next)
EM.next_tick { stream_data(chunks, &block) }
rescue StopIteration
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't StopIteration clause already catch the case you're trying to address here? stream_data is iterating over the body of response and that will raise an error if the body is closed, which will in turn call terminate_request?

Can we wire up a spec to highlight where the current logic is not sufficient?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@janko janko May 26, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't StopIteration clause already catch the case you're trying to address here?

StopIteration is raised when there are no more chunks. That would be the case only if this example Rack response body:

file = File.open("/path/to/file")
body = Enumerator.new { |y| y << file.read(16*1024) until file.eof? }
body = Rack::BodyProxy.new(body) { file.close } # given block is called on `#close`

was modified to catch the closed file and stop the iteration:

body = Enumerator.new do |y|
  begin
    y << file.read(16*1024) until file.eof?
  rescue IOError
  end
end

But I don't write Rack response bodies like that, because I assume that when the web server calls #close on the body object, it will not continue iteration anymore.

stream_data is iterating over the body of response and that will raise an error if the body is closed, which will in turn call terminate_request?

In some cases it will. I thought at first that the fact that #server_exception also writes the error response to the socket would be a problem, but when #close was called the connection should be closed, so that shouldn't happen. But I think the fact that an exception will be logged is not ideal.

Also, in my case I'm streaming an S3 object through Goliath, and my Rack response body object doesn't do anything on #close, so Goliath will happily continue downloading the S3 object even if there is nowhere to send the data to (e.g. the connection to the client has been closed). That's the case I'm most concerned about, as I think that can allow DoSing.

Can we wire up a spec to highlight where the current logic is not sufficient?

Yeah, I'll try again to come up with something.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@janko-m curious, any particular reason why you don't or can't wrap your stream in Rack::BodyProxy? Based on above, it seems like it would give you the behavior you're after — no?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@janko janko May 28, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If Rack::BodyProxy#each would terminate iterating over the (enumerable) body once #close is called on it, then it would be what I'm after. In other words, if it would behave like this:

body = 10.times.lazy.map { |i| "chunk #{i}" }
body = Rack::BodyProxy.new(body) { ... }
enum = body.enum_for(:each)

enum.next #=> "chunk 0"
enum.next #=> "chunk 1"

body.close

enum.next # doesn't return "chunk 2" but raises StopIteration instead

But from what I can see it doesn't.

Expand Down
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions lib/goliath/response.rb
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ class Response
def initialize
@headers = Goliath::Headers.new
@status = 200
@closed = false
end

# Creates the header line for the response
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -72,6 +73,14 @@ def headers=(key_value_pairs)
# @return [Nil]
def close
body.close if body.respond_to?(:close)
@closed = true
end

# Returns whether the response has been closed
#
# @return [Boolean]
def closed?
@closed
end

# Yields each portion of the response
Expand Down