Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mosaic/tiles support #3

Open
thomasmassmann opened this issue Jul 6, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Mosaic/tiles support #3

thomasmassmann opened this issue Jul 6, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
03 type: feature (plip) really new stuff or major change

Comments

@thomasmassmann
Copy link
Member

Should this package bring some tiles for Mosaic, or should this go into a separate package?

Should there be only a template for the content listing tile? Or do we need/want a separate tile?

One benefit for a separate tile would be to allow individual settings per gallery tile. When using the content listing template approach, settings could only be applied gloablly/per content item.

@MrTango MrTango added the 03 type: feature (plip) really new stuff or major change label Jul 7, 2020
@MrTango
Copy link
Contributor

MrTango commented Jul 7, 2020

Should this package bring some tiles for Mosaic, or should this go into a separate package?

I would like to see that happening soon.
I would keep it inside the gallery package, no need to create more packages, we have enough already ;).

Should there be only a template for the content listing tile? Or do we need/want a separate tile?

I was thinking about a content listing tile, to keep it simple and use the functionallity of the content listing tile..

One benefit for a separate tile would be to allow individual settings per gallery tile. When using the content listing template approach, settings could only be applied gloablly/per content item.

I see your point, but what would be the cost of complexity there?
Do we have to reimplement the content listing, or is it doable by mostly reusing what is there + some config options?

Right now we don't have config option at all, but we proably should add at least some settings to the registry.
I would wait with a control panel, until we have decided if this might be part of Plone core. For that we need to PLIP it and the approval. Than we would proably integrate the settings into existing control panels, if that make sense.

@thomasmassmann
Copy link
Member Author

I see your point, but what would be the cost of complexity there?
Do we have to reimplement the content listing, or is it doable by mostly reusing what is there + some config options?

We can have both. A simple template for the content listing tile, and a dedicated tile with more advanced options. This one could extend the content listing tile and provide some settings (and remove the layout selection option)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
03 type: feature (plip) really new stuff or major change
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants