Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

Revisit the executor cache #8846

Open
pepyakin opened this issue May 18, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Revisit the executor cache #8846

pepyakin opened this issue May 18, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
I7-refactor Code needs refactoring. I9-optimisation An enhancement to provide better overall performance in terms of time-to-completion for a task.

Comments

@pepyakin
Copy link
Contributor

pepyakin commented May 18, 2021

Currently the executor cache has several layers.

The first layer caches different instantiations of the runtime. That is, a specific code hash of the runtime and specific values of heap_pages and the method. Requesting a runtime with the same code hash but different params will be treated as a different runtime. If the cache is at its capacity then the least recently used instantiation is evicted. The cache is hardcoded to have 2 instantiations at the same time. At the same time there is no time based expiry. Once created, the instantiation lives on until it's evicted.

Then the instantiation hosts a vector of wasm instances ready to be executed. By default it keeps 8 instances. This way the executor can serve the runtime calls with very low latency.

This very same cache is shared among different parts of the system. The cache is used by syncing, offchain workers, RPC, block authoring. Some of them are on the critical path and others are more tolerable.

Examples.

Major syncing will need one instantiation with multiple wasm runtime instances in it. Bumping into a runtime upgrade we can pay the price of flushing the runtime caches.

During the idle syncing the behavior differs. Typically there is one block to import. However, e.g. for BABE, sometimes there can be up to 3-4 forks. Furthermore, for BABE, there are two runtime calls are required to be performed. Hence the 8 instances. This only matters for the nodes that care about latency such as block producers.

Sometimes, block producers run offchain workers. Running those should not get in the way of the syncing and block producing. The same applies for the transaction validation.

An archive node may need to be able to answer lots of requests across multiple runtimes. Those RPC requests should not lead to eviction of the runtimes dedicated for syncing.

Problems. There are problems besides the executor cache itself. Runtime is entered through the Runtime APIs. This mechanism abstracts the low level details of calling into wasm and whatnot. Unfortunately, it also doesn't provide the way to specify either wasm executor or caching specifics.

Possibly related #8251

@pepyakin pepyakin added I7-refactor Code needs refactoring. I9-optimisation An enhancement to provide better overall performance in terms of time-to-completion for a task. labels May 20, 2021
@stale

This comment was marked as resolved.

@stale stale bot added the A5-stale Pull request did not receive any updates in a long time. No review needed at this stage. Close it. label Jul 7, 2021
@pepyakin pepyakin removed the A5-stale Pull request did not receive any updates in a long time. No review needed at this stage. Close it. label Jul 7, 2021
@pepyakin

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
I7-refactor Code needs refactoring. I9-optimisation An enhancement to provide better overall performance in terms of time-to-completion for a task.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant