Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Deprecation] Deprecate Gov1 pallets #168

Open
2 tasks
juangirini opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 15 comments
Open
2 tasks

[Deprecation] Deprecate Gov1 pallets #168

juangirini opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 15 comments
Labels
I5-enhancement An additional feature request. T1-FRAME This PR/Issue is related to core FRAME, the framework. T13-deprecation The current issue/pr is, or should be, part of a deprecation process.

Comments

@juangirini
Copy link
Contributor

juangirini commented Jun 7, 2023

Motivated by the conversation started in paritytech/substrate#14241 (comment) Gov1 pallets should be deprecated

Pallets to deprecate

They should follow the Deprecation Process.

@juangirini
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kianenigma @ggwpez what's the full list of Gov1 pallets?

@juangirini
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is related to #485

@liamaharon
Copy link
Contributor

@kianenigma @ggwpez what's the full list of Gov1 pallets?

  • elections-phragmen
  • democracy
  • tips
  • collective
  • membership

@liamaharon
Copy link
Contributor

noting here a possible deprecating strategy for these suggested by Gav:

Mark as deprecated and remove in 6 months; best to include the date for removal in the #[deprecated = "..."] message.

@juangirini
Copy link
Contributor Author

This suggestion by Gav is already covered in the deprecation process, except for the date note that I will add.

@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor

@kianenigma @ggwpez what's the full list of Gov1 pallets?

  • elections-phragmen
  • democracy
  • tips
  • collective
  • membership

Isn't things like collective and membership are still being used? Best is to check the Kusama runtime and see what pallets are still in there as a part of the governance process.

@liamaharon
Copy link
Contributor

liamaharon commented Jun 12, 2023

@kianenigma @ggwpez what's the full list of Gov1 pallets?

  • elections-phragmen
  • democracy
  • tips
  • collective
  • membership

Isn't things like collective and membership are still being used? Best is to check the Kusama runtime and see what pallets are still in there as a part of the governance process.

Yup I checked. All instances of pallet_collective and pallet_membership were removed from the Kusama runtime in this PR paritytech/polkadot#6701

@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor

kianenigma commented Jun 12, 2023

But they might be still used in system parachains such as

https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/blob/d20c4283fe85df0c1ef8cb7c9eb7c09abbcbfa31/parachains/runtimes/collectives/collectives-polkadot/src/lib.rs#L460

All in all, I would argue that between the 5, collective and membership are more useful as independent building-blocks that can be used outside the context of a governance system as well, so if any of them is to still receive support, it should be these two.

Moreover, paritytech/substrate#12588 will make elections-phragmen into a generic election pallet, and it can always be a nice addition to collectives.

Contrary, while we have the gov v2 pallets, something like pallet-governance has less reason to exist.

All in all, i think tips and democracy should go, elections maybe, the rest we should keep.

@liamaharon
Copy link
Contributor

I see what you mean now, thanks for clarifying 👍

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Jun 12, 2023

Can we have some process for such ecosystem wide impact breaking changes? I can’t be just an informal decision from a few devs. It can be a formal decision from a few devs if there is a formal process used with documents of the process.

Yeah I know there will be a depreciation process and I am sure someone will notify you if you deprecated that something shouldn’t be depreciated, but still, how do you decide what should be depreciated?

Besides, there are many other less used pallets in FRAME. Have you considered remove those first? e.g. atomic-swap, insecure-randomness-collective-flip, lottery, nicks.

@juangirini
Copy link
Contributor Author

As mentioned in the issue description there is indeed a deprecation process for this #182.

We are indeed working on improving processes and documenting them, but of course there is still a lot of work to be done. All constructive suggestions are welcome.

There might be other deprecations in the future, this issues is about Gov1.

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Jun 13, 2023

I am asking for the process to determine what pallet to remove from this repo and apply this process to less used pallets first before gov1 pallets. This process happens before the deprecation process. Or in other words, the deprecation process is only a step in this pallet removal process.

@juangirini
Copy link
Contributor Author

@muharem could you please check the list of pallets to deprecate?

@muharem
Copy link
Contributor

muharem commented Jul 14, 2023

@juangirini I can only add that pallet_collectives used in Collectives parachain, which we can migrate.
the list corresponds to what we removed/removing with integrating Gov2.
and I agree with what was said above, we should not remove the pallets from substrate just because they are not used in polkadot/kusama runtimes anymore. There is should be an alternative (democracy -> referenda) or another reason.

@juangirini
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gov1 pallets that have a Gov2 alternative will be deprecated and eventually archived. Any team external to Parity will be free to clone that repo and maintain it.

@juangirini juangirini transferred this issue from paritytech/substrate Aug 24, 2023
@the-right-joyce the-right-joyce added I5-enhancement An additional feature request. T1-FRAME This PR/Issue is related to core FRAME, the framework. and removed J0-enhancement labels Aug 25, 2023
@the-right-joyce the-right-joyce added T13-deprecation The current issue/pr is, or should be, part of a deprecation process. and removed I11-deprecation labels Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
I5-enhancement An additional feature request. T1-FRAME This PR/Issue is related to core FRAME, the framework. T13-deprecation The current issue/pr is, or should be, part of a deprecation process.
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants