Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stakeholder analysis #165

Open
hythloda opened this issue May 16, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Stakeholder analysis #165

hythloda opened this issue May 16, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
administration documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@hythloda
Copy link
Member

We need to perform a stakeholder analysis is to outline the key stakeholders and their needs for the project. It is important to have a clear understanding of each stakeholder and what they are expecting from the project from the start.

@hythloda hythloda added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation administration labels May 16, 2023
@SecurityCRob
Copy link
Contributor

I'll start us out, patches/comments welcome.
From my perspective we need to address the following audiences with our collective work:

  • Open Source maintainers/developers/projects: need useful tools, processes, and training to do their jobs securely, with minimal friction and loss of velocity.
  • The OpenSSF Membership: similar needs to maintainers, but also focus on supply chain security.
  • The OpenSSF Governing Board: needs clear data and updates on foundation activities to make business decisions.
  • Open Source Consumers: need tools and signals to understand and evaluate the security qualities of the software they are using and the supply chains it is created in.
  • Other Open Source Foundations/Standards Bodies: needs collaboration on areas of shared interest and in the furtherance of the open source ecosystem.

@gkunz
Copy link
Contributor

gkunz commented May 22, 2023

Additional groups could include security researchers and policy makers (OSPOs thereof).

@sevansdell
Copy link
Contributor

@hythloda / @SecurityCRob where should this stakeholder analysis live? Is this a staff document, TAC process page, or something else? I recommend we post what we have to date, and iterate as needed.

@SecurityCRob
Copy link
Contributor

any updates or progress on this? should we close this out due to lack of activity?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
administration documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants