Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: The targets R package: a dynamic Make-like function-oriented pipeline toolkit for reproducibility and high-performance computing #2958

Closed
whedon opened this issue Jan 15, 2021 · 12 comments
Assignees
Labels
pre-review R rOpenSci Submissions associated with rOpenSci Shell TeX

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented Jan 15, 2021

Submitting author: @wlandau (William Landau)
Repository: https://github.com/ropensci/targets
Version: 0.0.1
Editor: @arfon
Reviewers: @arfon
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @wlandau. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@wlandau if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 15, 2021

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

@arfon arfon added the rOpenSci Submissions associated with rOpenSci label Jan 15, 2021
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 15, 2021

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 15, 2021

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=1.29 s (247.0 files/s, 20229.3 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                      files          blank        comment           code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               295           1572           2447          19638
SVG                               2              0              0            764
JSON                              1              0              0            511
Markdown                         12            127              0            424
YAML                              4             32              0            249
TeX                               1             14              0            108
Rmd                               2             54             90              9
Bourne Again Shell                1              0              5              4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            318           1799           2542          21707
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '01655ea691b9a529f338d1ff' was
gathered on 2021/01/15.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 15, 2021

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 15, 2021

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.00550 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01686 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz284 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jan 15, 2021

@whedon assign me as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 15, 2021

OK, the editor is @arfon

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jan 15, 2021

@whedon assign @arfon as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 15, 2021

OK, @arfon is now a reviewer

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jan 15, 2021

@whedon start review

@arfon arfon closed this as completed Jan 15, 2021
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jan 15, 2021

OK, I've started the review over in #2959.

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jan 15, 2021

Moving this through a fast-track review as this was reviewed in ropensci/software-review#401

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pre-review R rOpenSci Submissions associated with rOpenSci Shell TeX
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants