Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Report order cycle distributor totals by supplier gives wrong information in relation to delivery method #12877

Open
nicolasVr opened this issue Sep 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug-s3 The bug is stopping a critical or non-critical feature but there is a usable workaround.

Comments

@nicolasVr
Copy link

Description

This is the only report that displays delivery method for order cycles. But the result is wrong as explained below.

Expected Behavior

The report should give the total quantity for each delivery method :
Product | Qtty | Delivery Method
A | 3 | Place X
A | 4 | Place Y

Actual Behaviour

Instead of that there is only 1 line per product and I don't know how the delivery method displayed is chosen. We'll get for our example :
Product | Qtty | Delivery Method
A | 7 | Place X

Steps to Reproduce

Ask a report for an order cycle where a product has been ordered with 2 different delivery methods.

Workaround

No report with this information !

Severity

s3 ?

@sigmundpetersen sigmundpetersen added the bug-s3 The bug is stopping a critical or non-critical feature but there is a usable workaround. label Sep 30, 2024
@chahmedejaz chahmedejaz self-assigned this Oct 7, 2024
@RachL
Copy link
Contributor

RachL commented Oct 12, 2024

@chahmedejaz Ahmed hold on I don't think we have budget for this one. Can you have a look at estimating the issues I've linked here instead ? https://openfoodnetwork.slack.com/archives/C01T75H6G0Z/p1728638876580479

@chahmedejaz
Copy link
Collaborator

Sure @RachL let me do that 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug-s3 The bug is stopping a critical or non-critical feature but there is a usable workaround.
Projects
Status: All the things 💤
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants