Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MAX4945 might be the wrong choice for this design #1

Open
jonnew opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

MAX4945 might be the wrong choice for this design #1

jonnew opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@jonnew
Copy link

jonnew commented Nov 17, 2021

MAX4945 is an under/overvoltage lockout circuit used to protect the headstage. It turns on with the range 4.15 to 5.8V, which seems perfect. But there is an interesting issue that occurs when using a long and thin tether. Because of the series resistance of the tether, the voltage under no load needs to be quite high (e.g. like 7.5V). This way when the headstage starts to draw current and voltage is dropped on the tether, it settles at 5 or so volts at the headstage input. However, when using the MAX4945, 7.5V is too high for the headstage to ever turn on and we enter a deadlock. Choosing a version of this chip with a much wider range is probably a good idea (e.g. MAX4943 which has 7.4V overvoltage lockout) or it might just need to be bypassed. Alternatively, lower DC resistance tethers can be used (e.g. like the ones on the miniscope).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant