Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alternative specification of FASTQs and read structures #39

Open
nh13 opened this issue May 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Alternative specification of FASTQs and read structures #39

nh13 opened this issue May 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nh13
Copy link
Member

nh13 commented May 19, 2024

Description of feature

See original discussion: #38 (comment)

Currently the pipeline requires a list of FASTQs and a list of read structures, where the order matters. Could we consider more explicit alternatives that could be added in addition to the current way to specify them?

E.g. eExplicitly named fastq/read-structure pairs. We could use names like R1, R2, I1(i7), and I2(i5)

@nh13 nh13 added the enhancement New feature or request label May 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant