Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User-friendly interface for intercomparison results #338

Open
hannah-rae opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

User-friendly interface for intercomparison results #338

hannah-rae opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good-first-issue

Comments

@hannah-rae
Copy link
Contributor

Context:
The intercomparison_script.ipynb notebook creates results for inter-comparing the accuracy of many land cover/cropland maps for a subset of our evaluation datasets (configured in src/compare_covermaps.py). The results are stored in notebooks/intercomparison-results.csv.

Problem:
The CSV of results is not very user-friendly to read and understand the comparative performance of maps for a given country/test set. A user-friendly interface could be created to explore the intercomparison results.

Potential Solution:
There are many potential solutions that could be brainstormed for this, but potential solutions could include:

  • a webpage that reads from the results CSV and allows users to select a test set/country and visualize the associated results
  • static plots that are generated and stored in intercomparison_script.ipynb whenever the results are updated
@hannah-rae hannah-rae added enhancement New feature or request good-first-issue labels Aug 25, 2023
@Dev-Destructor
Copy link

Hey, how about an SSR website build using Next.js which will read through the CSV and visualize output?

@Aniket-Parlikar
Copy link
Contributor

Interested in contributing to this issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good-first-issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants