Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for AsyncAPI #539

Open
iancooper opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Support for AsyncAPI #539

iancooper opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
status:needs-discussion An issue that requires more discussion internally before resolving type:feature New experience request

Comments

@iancooper
Copy link

Is there any desire to extend this to cover AsyncAPI: https://www.asyncapi.com/

I am thinking of forking this to POC that, and wondered what the interest would be in extending this project to support that model too

@darrelmiller
Copy link
Member

That's a really interesting question. I think we would need to have two distinct DOM roots but we could share come of the common models. I would be reluctant to start mixing things that are unique to AsyncAPI into the same models.

How would you envision adding support for it?

@iancooper
Copy link
Author

Hi @darrelmiller,

As there are a lot of shared building blocks, I was hoping it would be possible to build on those. I'm going to have look at it this week and next, and I'll get back to you with a little more detail in the new year. If no one else has it on the radar, it could be worth my doing that investigation

Ian

@phatcher
Copy link

@iancooper Did you get anywhere with supporting AsyncAPI? Just had the same need on a microservice project I'm building

@iancooper
Copy link
Author

@phatcher In the end we didn't end up writing anything here, we used the react templates to generate infra from the template, but have not gotten around to parsing the template from .net code. We might want to do it at some point, to validate code against the specification, but it is further off in our roadmap, for now

@adhiambovivian adhiambovivian added type:feature New experience request status:needs-discussion An issue that requires more discussion internally before resolving labels Apr 4, 2023
@BechtelCanDoIt
Copy link

I'm working on a project that needs this. If I have to write the OpenAPI definitions by hand how would I approach that?

@derberg
Copy link

derberg commented Sep 18, 2023

Hey folks, just wanted to let you know that folks from LEGO Group open sourced AsyncAPI.NET

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status:needs-discussion An issue that requires more discussion internally before resolving type:feature New experience request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants