Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pushing updates about Groups (Communities) to clients #1222

Closed
benparsons opened this issue May 10, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Pushing updates about Groups (Communities) to clients #1222

benparsons opened this issue May 10, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success obsolete A proposal which has been overtaken by other proposals proposal A matrix spec change proposal

Comments

@benparsons
Copy link
Member

Documentation: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GzwhGdnWWMENYOaXMFP8CD-M9ny1vznxHnNqT3I3NZI
Author: @ara4n
Date: 02/01/2018

@ara4n ara4n added the proposal A matrix spec change proposal label May 15, 2018
@non-Jedi
Copy link
Contributor

non-Jedi commented May 24, 2018

For anyone else still trying to figure out how groups updates work in practice, currently synapse includes a key "groups" in the /sync response that looks like this:

{'leave': {},
 'join': {},
 'invite': {'+test:thebeckmeyers.xyz': {'profile': {'avatar_url': None,
    'name': 'test'},
   'inviter': '@adam:thebeckmeyers.xyz'}}}

(note that above is copy-pasted from python-sdk, so some stuff might be off from standard json formatting)

If this is just a remnant that won't be sticking around, I'd appreciate some clarification to that effect and maybe a pointer towards how we should currently be tracking groups.

@turt2live turt2live mentioned this issue Aug 14, 2018
5 tasks
@turt2live turt2live added the kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success label Apr 21, 2020
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

I think this is largely superseded by MSC1772: Spaces

@mscbot fcp close

@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Mar 18, 2021

Team member @turt2live has proposed to close this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged people:

Once at least 75% of reviewers approve (and there are no outstanding concerns), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for information about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@mscbot mscbot added disposition-close proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the final comment period. labels Mar 18, 2021
@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Apr 6, 2021

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@mscbot mscbot added final-comment-period This MSC has entered a final comment period in interest to approval, postpone, or delete in 5 days. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the final comment period. labels Apr 6, 2021
@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Apr 11, 2021

The final comment period, with a disposition to close, as per the review above, is now complete.

@mscbot mscbot closed this as completed Apr 11, 2021
@mscbot mscbot added finished-final-comment-period and removed disposition-close final-comment-period This MSC has entered a final comment period in interest to approval, postpone, or delete in 5 days. labels Apr 11, 2021
@turt2live turt2live added obsolete A proposal which has been overtaken by other proposals and removed finished-final-comment-period labels Apr 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success obsolete A proposal which has been overtaken by other proposals proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants