Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSC2140: Terms of Service for ISes and IMs #2140

Merged
merged 62 commits into from
Aug 26, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
62 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
23af87e
Proposal for IS & IM TOS API
dbkr Jun 20, 2019
32c7fc6
you have a number now
dbkr Jun 20, 2019
cf48030
One more tradeoff
dbkr Jun 20, 2019
276e2b6
Typo
dbkr Jun 21, 2019
d4ca0c2
Specify ID grammar and add comma
dbkr Jun 21, 2019
9ca3ccc
Add requirments section for de-duping between services.
dbkr Jun 21, 2019
a63e442
Linkify
dbkr Jun 24, 2019
4ba9b2a
perfix
dbkr Jun 24, 2019
2555801
m.third_party_terms -> m.accepted_terms
dbkr Jun 24, 2019
8ae4755
s/Third Party/Accepted/
dbkr Jun 24, 2019
abb4071
HS docs must be added too
dbkr Jun 24, 2019
2c09580
line wrap
dbkr Jun 25, 2019
6f374dc
Re-write for OpenID auth
dbkr Jun 25, 2019
0dae2d5
GET terms must be unauthed.
dbkr Jun 25, 2019
9e0d8b9
Use M_CONSENT_NOT_GIVEN
dbkr Jun 25, 2019
5709427
Typing hard is
dbkr Jun 26, 2019
af691b5
Clarify this applies to 2134
dbkr Jun 26, 2019
1d75828
Clarify what to do if no (new) docs
dbkr Jun 26, 2019
ba7047c
Clarify we must be accepting HS auth
dbkr Jun 26, 2019
4edf826
Capitalise on our identifiers
dbkr Jun 26, 2019
6273868
Clarify v1 API deprecation
dbkr Jun 26, 2019
58cf083
backwards compat
dbkr Jun 26, 2019
2694bb1
Add really horrible custom HTTP header
dbkr Jun 26, 2019
21b9eaf
No custom HTTP headers
dbkr Jun 26, 2019
b5326de
Exclude requestToken endpoints from auth requirement
dbkr Jun 27, 2019
10a6a59
Deprecate `bind_email` / `bind_msisdn`
dbkr Jun 27, 2019
f95197b
make the many-anded sentence a list
dbkr Jun 27, 2019
4be283c
Typing
dbkr Jun 27, 2019
83bb386
line wrap
dbkr Jun 28, 2019
45d6309
back to M_TERMS_NOT_SIGNED
dbkr Jun 28, 2019
786d5bc
rewrite UI auth tradeoffs
dbkr Jun 28, 2019
fe14d3c
Spec terms response
dbkr Jun 28, 2019
8af35be
Typo
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
2d11217
Typo
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
5374030
Drop application/x-form-www-urlencoded in v2
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
f02e4c2
both registers are excluded from auth
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
d00dfb7
exclude submittoken too
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
03e6ab0
re-word double openid
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
7f65364
Typo
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
ac6b9bd
s/deprecate/remove/
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
79dbad2
remove acceptance token mention
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
10858bf
set account data after registration
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
4c72c37
slash
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
e28f7aa
slash
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
d15c9df
fullstop
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
1a66934
http status code
dbkr Jul 2, 2019
30dcc28
try & clarify that HS signature isn't the only acceptable auth for un…
dbkr Jul 4, 2019
bf8a1e5
Add way to get the HS to bind/unbind existing 3pids
dbkr Jul 5, 2019
701d340
Remove exception for request/submitToken
dbkr Jul 5, 2019
9bb6ad8
typo
dbkr Jul 10, 2019
f474b31
typo
dbkr Jul 12, 2019
6e061b1
unnecessary capital
dbkr Jul 12, 2019
25a47af
unnecessary capital mk. 2
dbkr Jul 12, 2019
a1de6ff
Hopefully clarify some bits
dbkr Jul 15, 2019
d9269b0
Exclude pubkey endpoints from auth
dbkr Jul 15, 2019
e4bdc28
Apply suggestions from code review
dbkr Aug 19, 2019
12377fb
/account/logout not /logout
dbkr Aug 19, 2019
6d00673
clarify error proxying
dbkr Aug 19, 2019
4073d94
Typo
dbkr Aug 21, 2019
6931541
Typo
dbkr Aug 21, 2019
8bd9d7c
Add full stop
dbkr Aug 21, 2019
4ea8f64
is_token -> id_access_token and add invite to proxy list
dbkr Aug 21, 2019
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
335 changes: 335 additions & 0 deletions proposals/2140-terms-of-service-2.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,335 @@
# MSC2140: Terms of Service API for Identity Servers and Integration Managers

[MSC1692](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1692) introduces a
method for homeservers to require that users read and agree to certain
documents before being permitted to use the service. This proposal introduces a
corresponding method that can be used with Identity Servers and Integration
Managers.

Requirements for this proposal are:
* ISes and IMs should be able to give multiple documents a user must agree to
abide by
* Each document shoud be versioned
* ISes and IMs must, for each request that they handle, know that the user
making the request has agreed to their data being used. This need not be
absolute proof (we will always have to trust that the client actually
showed the document to the user) but it must be reasonably demonstrable that
the user has given informed consent for the client to use that service.
* ISes and IMs must be able to prevent users from using the service if they
have not provided agreement.
* A user should only have to agree to each version of each document once for
their Matrix ID, ie. having agreed to a set of terms in one client, they
should not have to agree to them again when using a different client.
* Documents should be de-duplicated between services. If two or more services
are hosted by the same organisation, the organisation should have the
option to give their users a single document that encompasses both services
(bearing in mind that the user must be able to opt-out of components of a
service whilst still being able to use the service without that component).

Identity Servers do not currently require any kind of user login to access the
service and so are unable to track what users have agreed to what terms in the
way that Homeservers do.

## Proposal

Throuhgout this proposal, $prefix will be used to refer to the prefix of the
API in question, ie. `/_matrix/identity/v2` for the IS API and
`/_matrix/integrations/v1` for the IM API.

Note the removal of the `/api` prefix and migration to v2 in the IS API
following convention from
[MSC2134](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/2134).

This proposal introduces:
* A v2 API prefix, with authentication, for the Identity Service
* The `$prefix/terms` endpoint
* The `m.accepted_terms` section in account data
* `POST /_matrix/client/r0/account/3pid/unbind` endpoints on the client/server
API

This proposal removes:
* The `bind_email` and `bind_msisdn` on the Homeserver `/register` endpoint

This proposal relies on both Integration Managers and Identity Servers being
able to identify users by their MXID and store the fact that a given MXID has
indicated that they accept the terms given. Integration Managers already
identify users in this way by authenticating them using the OpenID endpoint on
the Homeserver. This proposal introduces the same mechanism to Identity Servers
and adds authentication across the Identity Service API.

### IS API Authentication

All current endpoints within `/_matrix/identity/api/v1/` will be duplicated
dbkr marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we also want to drop lookups done without using the hashing aware endpoints?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, in reality we'll probably end up having non-hashed on v1 and hashed on v2, then deprecating non-hashed and v1 at the same time. I didn't wamt to tie this too much to the hashing msc so not sure whether to add that here or not.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

v2 supports non-hashed so there's no reason to keep v1 around.

into `/_matrix/identity/v2`, noting that MSC2134 changes the behaviour of
lookups. Authentication is still expected on MSC2134's proposed endpoints.
Support for `application/x-form-www-urlencoded` parameters in requests will
be dropped from all endpoints.

Any request to any endpoint within `/_matrix/identity/v2`, with the exception
of:
* `/_matrix/identity/v2`
* `/_matrix/identity/v2/pubkey/*`
* The new `$prefix/account/register` endpoint
* The new `GET /_matrix/identity/v2/terms`
* `$prefix/account/logout`

...may return an error with `M_UNAUTHORIZED` errcode with HTTP status code 401.
This indicates that the user must authenticate with OpenID and supply a valid
`access_token`.

Clients authenticate either via an `Authorization` header with a `Bearer` token
or an `access_token` query parameter.

The existing endpoints under `/_matrix/identity/api/v1/` continue to be
unauthenticated but will be deprecated. ISes may support the old v1 API for as
long as they wish. Once ISes remove support for the old APIs, those endpoints
must return HTTP Status 404. Clients must update to use the v2 API as soon as
possible.

OpenID authentication in the IS API will work the same as in the Integration Manager
API, as specified in [MSC1961](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1961).

When clients supply an identity server to the Homeserver in order for the
dbkr marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Homeserver to make calls to the IS on its behalf, it must also supply its
access token for the Identity Server alongside in the `id_access_token` key of
the same JSON object. That is, in the main request object for `requestToken`
and `/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{roomId}/invite` requests and in the
`threepidCreds` object when supplying 3PID credentials (eg. in the
`m.email.identity` UI auth stage). The server must also relay
`M_TERMS_NOT_SIGNED` errors back to the client. Exceptions to this are any
requests where the only IS operation the Homeserver may perform is unbinding,
ie. `/_matrix/client/r0/account/deactivate` and
`/_matrix/client/r0/account/3pid/delete`, in which case the unbind will be
authenticated by a signed request from the Homeserver.

### HS Register API

The `bind_email` and `bind_msisdn` options to `/_matrix/client/r0/register` in
the client/server API will be removed. Due to the fact that
`/_matrix/identity/v2/3pid/bind` requires authentication, it will no longer be
possible for the Homeserver to bind 3PIDs as part of the registration process.

### IS Register API

The following new APIs will be introduced to support OpenID auth as per
[MSC1961](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1961):

* `/_matrix/identity/v2/account/register`
* `/_matrix/identity/v2/account`
* `/_matrix/identity/v2/account/logout`

Note again the removal of the `/api` prefix and migration to v2 following
convention from
[MSC2134](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/2134).

### Terms API

New API endpoints will be introduced:

#### `GET $prefix/terms`:
This returns a set of documents that the user must agree to abide by in order
to use the service. Its response is similar to the structure used in the
`m.terms` UI auth flow of the Client/Server API:

```json
{
"policies": {
"terms_of_service": {
dbkr marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
"version": "2.0",
"en": {
"name": "Terms of Service",
"url": "https://example.org/somewhere/terms-2.0-en.html"
},
"fr": {
"name": "Conditions d'utilisation",
"url": "https://example.org/somewhere/terms-2.0-fr.html"
}
},
"privacy_policy": {
"version": "1.2",
"en": {
erikjohnston marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
"name": "Privacy Policy",
"url": "https://example.org/somewhere/privacy-1.2-en.html"
},
"fr": {
"name": "Politique de confidentialité",
"url": "https://example.org/somewhere/privacy-1.2-fr.html"
}
}
}
}
```

Each document (ie. key/value pair in the 'policies' object) MUST be
turt2live marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
uniquely identified by its URL. It is therefore strongly recommended
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it make sense to uniquely identify by tuple of (<type>, <version>, <url>)? That would give de-duplication while still allowing just https://matrix.org/legal.html, as well as not having to do any crazy lookups?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Possibly - otoh I sort of like forcing the version to be in the URL for general URL transparency.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I'm just a little nervous that if we end up having three or more different services, each with multiple policies, with some churn of versions of the years, plus an increasing number of languages, then we'll end up with quite a lot of different stuff to check.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Travis points out that we discussed this kind of thing in #2140 (comment) as eventually the conclusion was that de-duping by URL is probably the lesser evil.

that the URL contains the version number of the document. The name
and version keys, however, are used only to provide a human-readable
description of the document to the user.

This endpoint does *not* require authentication.

#### `POST $prefix/terms`:
Requests to this endpoint have a single key, `user_accepts` whose value is
a list of URLs (given by the `url` field in the GET response) of documents that
the user has agreed to:

```json
{
"user_accepts": ["https://example.org/somewhere/terms-2.0-en.html"]
turt2live marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
}
```

This endpoint requires authentication.

The clients MUST include the correct URL for the language of the document that
turt2live marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
was presented to the user and they agreed to. Servers should accept agreement
of any one language of each document as sufficient, regardless of what language
a client is operating in: users should not have to re-consent to documents if
they change their client to a different language.

The server responds with an empty JSON object. The server must not assume that
the client will agree to all documents in a single request.

### Accepted Terms Account Data

This proposal also defines the `m.accepted_terms` section in User Account
Data in the client/server API that clients SHOULD use to track what sets of
terms the user has consented to. This has an array of URLs under the 'accepted'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we have a dictionary policy_id -> policy_url instead of an array of URLs?
That will help to know which types of document the user has already signed. Matrix clients could then detect an update of one policy.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might also be useful to know the version of the document the user saw too, so could have:

{
    "accepted": [
        {
            "url": "https://example.org/somewhere/terms-1.2-en.html",
            "version": "1.2",
            "id": "terms_of_service",
        },
        {
            "url": "https://example.org/somewhere/privacy-1.2-en.html",
            "version": "1.2",
            "id": "privacy_policy",
        }
    ]
}

...maybe?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For this MSC, the policy ID feels like it is not meant to be trusted and could change at any time, so I am wary of making any assumptions about it. Maybe the MSC should explicitly state something like: "The terms response contains these policy IDs largely to match similar behaviour from the homeserver, but don't assume anything about them, they may change at any time, etc. The URL is the thing that matters."

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the homeserver version being MSC1692 where the policy ID actually means something. The homeserver version supports optional and non-optional changes to policies whereas this MSC does not (for valid reasons on both fronts, I believe).

key to which the user has agreed to.

An `m.accepted_terms` section therefore resembles the following:

```json
{
"accepted": [
"https://example.org/somewhere/terms-1.2-en.html",
"https://example.org/somewhere/privacy-1.2-en.html"
]
}
```

Whenever a client submits a `POST $prefix/terms` request to an IS or IM or
completes an `m.terms` flow on the HS (or as soon as possible afterwards, ie.
after registration is complete), it SHOULD update this account data section
adding any the URLs of any additional documents that the user agreed to to this
list.

### Terms Acceptance in the API

Before any requests are made to an Identity Server or Integration Manager,
the client must use the `GET $prefix/terms` endpoint to fetch the set of
documents that the user must agree to in order to use the service.

It then cross-references this set of documents against the `m.accepted_terms`
account data and presents to the user any documents that they have not already
agreed to, along with UI for them to indicate their agreement. If there are no
such documents (ie. if the `policies` dict is empty or the user has already
agreed to all documents) the client proceeds to perform the OpenID
registration. If there are new terms documents, the client prompts the user for
agreement, then once the user has indicated their agreement, it adds these URLs
to `m.accepted_terms` account data and then proceeds with OpenID
authentication, getting a token from the Homeserver and submitting this to the
service using the `register` endpoint.

Having done this, if the user agreed to any new documents, it performs a `POST
$prefix/terms` request to signal to the server the set of documents that the
user has agreed to.

Any request to any endpoint in the IM API, and the `/_matrix/identity/v2/`
namespace of the IS API, with the exception of `/_matrix/identity/v2` itself,
may return:

* `M_UNAUTHORIZED` errcode with HTTP status code 401. This indicates that
the user must authenticate with OpenID and supply a valid `access_token`.
* `M_TERMS_NOT_SIGNED` errcode with HTTP status code 403. This indicates
that the user must agree to (new) terms in order to use or continue to
use the service.

The `/_matrix/identity/v2/3pid/unbind` endpoint must not return either of these
errors if the request has a valid signature from a Homeserver, and is being authenticated as such.

In summary, the process for using a service that has not previously been used
in the current login session is:

* `GET $prefix/terms`
* Compare result with `m.accepted_terms` account data, get set of documents
pending agreement.
* If non-empty, show this set of documents to the user and wait for the user
to indicate their agreement.
* Add the newly agreed documents to `m.accepted_terms`.
* On success, or if there were no documents pending agreement, get an OpenID
token from the Homeserver and submit this token to the `register` endpoint.
Store the resulting access token.
* If the set of documents pending agreement was non-empty, Perform a
`POST $prefix/terms` request to the service with these documents.

### `POST /_matrix/client/r0/account/3pid/unbind`

A client uses this client/server API endpoint to request that the Homeserver
removes the given 3PID from the given Identity Server, or all Identity Servers.
Takes the same parameters as
`POST /_matrix/client/r0/account/3pid/delete`, ie. `id_server`, `medium`,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we just deprecate the delete endpoint?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's still needed for clients to remove the 3pid from the HS though?

`address` and the newly added `is_token`.

Returns the same as `POST /_matrix/client/r0/account/3pid/delete`.

Clients may add IS bindings for 3PIDs that already exist on the user's
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The default state going forward (in Riot at least) will be that users first add a 3PID to the HS only. Then, in a separate step, they can also choose to share it with the IS as well.

It would be ideal if we could bind to the IS via the HS for a 3PID already known to HS (which is what will soon be happening quite often) in a single operation. Currently though, using the POST /_matrix/client/r0/account/3pid flow to re-add a 3PID with binding will fail with M_THREEPID_IN_USE. (It actually fails during the earlier POST /_matrix/client/r0/account/3pid/email/requestToken step.)

Since these CS APIs are authed, the HS knows whether the 3PID is in use by the authed user. It would be best to change the spec to allow re-adding an in use 3PID if it's in use by the current user.

In the short term, Riot will work around this by using two step operation of removing the 3PID from the HS and then re-adding with bind true.

Copy link
Contributor

@jryans jryans Aug 9, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are several different user flows involving 3PIDs, including:

  1. adding a 3PID during registration
  2. supplying a 3PID for password reset
  3. adding a 3PID to your account later on for recovery
  4. sharing a 3PID for discovery

It would be best from a data flow and privacy perspective if flows 1 - 3 could all be done using the HS only, possibly delegating to a token sending server if needed. matrix-org/synapse#5751 is heading in that direction.

For case 4 of sharing a 3PID for discovery, we currently proxy via the HS to the IS for this, mainly so that the HS has a record of 3PID associations that can be unbound when an account is deactivated.

Untitled

With v2 IS APIs and terms requirements, it becomes more complex for the HS to do this proxying. The user may need to agree terms with the IS, but the client isn't communicating with the IS directly.

@dbkr has written up several different options of how we could move forward. Option 4 there:

  1. Do the bind directly with the IS. The HS then won't know about the binding, but we could abuse the onbind callback to notify the HS that the 3pid has been bound. The onbind is unauthenticated so would have to be authed somehow (ensuring we had signoff from the user to add the binding: we can't just auth the IS or anyone could set up an IS and fill your account with random bindings). The onbind callback is also not necessarily super reliable: sydent will still do the bind successfully if it can't hit the onbind callback.

seems appealing, but it's so far unclear how to resolve the authentication issue.

Copy link
Contributor

@jryans jryans Aug 12, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At the moment, we are leaning towards option 2:

  1. Re-use /account/3pid (ie. the add-3pid API) with the bind flag set. This requires that HSes allow the requestToken to proceed if the 3pid is already registered to your account (synapse currently denies if the 3pid is known on the HS at all).

@anoadragon453 is planning to MSC this change.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

MSC2229 now describes this.

Copy link
Contributor

@jryans jryans Aug 15, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe this proposal should be updated to reference the new MSC as the suggested way of rebinding?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(in general, please link to the proposal PR instead of the markdown, as people delete branches sometimes: #2229 )

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm struggling to follow if this thread has been resolved or not?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe the technical problem is solved by #2229. It would be nice to mention that in this proposal, so I believe that's the only action left to resolve this thread.

Homeserver account by using the `POST /_matrix/client/r0/account/3pid`
to re-add the 3PID.

## Tradeoffs

The Identity Service API previously did not require authentication, and OpenID
is reasonably complex, adding a significant burden to both clients and servers.
A custom HTTP header was also considered that could be added to assert that the
client agrees to a particular set of terms. We decided against this in favour
of re-using existing primitives that already exist in the Matrix ecosystem.
Custom HTTP headers are not used anywhere else within Matrix. This also gives a
very simple and natural way for ISes to enforce that users may only bind 3PIDs
to their own MXIDs.

This introduces a different way of accepting terms from the client/server API
which uses User-Interactive Authentication. In the client/server API, the use
of UI auth allows terms acceptance to be integrated into the registration flow
in a simple and backwards-compatible way. Another option here would be to use
UI Auth on the register endpoint. This would also not allow users to register
before accepting the terms. However, this would then make the OpenID
registration process different and non-standard.

The `m.accepted_terms` section contains only URLs of the documents that
have been agreed to. This loses information like the name and version of
the document, but:
* It would be up to the clients to copy this information correctly into
account data.
* Having just the URLs makes it much easier for clients to make a list
turt2live marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
of URLs and find documents not already agreed to.

## Potential issues
turt2live marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

This change deprecates all v1 endpoints and so will require clients to update
to continue working.

## Security considerations

Requiring authentication on the IS API means it will no longer be possible to
use it anonymously.

It is assumed that once servers publish a given version of a document at a
given URL, the contents of that URL will not change. This could be mitigated by
identifying documents based on a hash of their contents rather than their URLs.
dbkr marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Agreement to terms in the client/server API makes this assumption, so this
proposal aims to be consistent.


## Conclusion

This proposal adds an error response to all endpoints on the API and a custom
HTTP header on all requests that is used to signal agreement to a set of terms
and conditions. The use of the header is only necessary if the server has no
other means of tracking acceptance of terms per-user. The IS API is not
authenticated so ISes will have no choice but to use the header. The IM API is
authenticated so IMs may either use the header or store acceptance per-user.

A separate endpoint is specified with a GET request for retrieving the set
of terms required and a POST to indicate that the user consents to those
terms.