You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a side effect of #4308, the tactic have : $ty := by $tacs* now requires all mvars in ty to be solved before elaborating tacs, which is not the case for other have forms but is the case for e.g. theorem. Everyone seems to agree that have should consistently behave like theorem in this respect, which should also help with parallelism.
As a side effect of #4308, the tactic
have : $ty := by $tacs*
now requires all mvars inty
to be solved before elaboratingtacs
, which is not the case for otherhave
forms but is the case for e.g.theorem
. Everyone seems to agree thathave
should consistently behave liketheorem
in this respect, which should also help with parallelism.Reported on Zulip.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: