-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow defining a rel table with multiple src/dst node tables #1888
Comments
This is currently indeed an awkward limitation when working with more generic relationships, such as eg.
This would make |
Hi @crtomirmajer , thanks for the suggestion! Yeah, indeed the syntax you propose makes a lot sense to me. It is quite close to what we have discussed internally 😄 |
What's the priority of this issue? Any ETA? |
Hi @crtomirmajer , we hope to add the support of this feature before the end of Aug, so it will be available on our master branch by then. But the release of it will wait until an official release in the mid of Sep. |
This should be available now with CREATE REL TABLE GROUP |
Real world applications can contain relationships with a large number of SRC/DST node table combinations.
Right now, we strictly force a rel table to be defined only with one src and one dst node table, which is best optimized. However, in terms of better user experience, we should gradually relax this restriction to support defining a rel table with multiple src/dst node tables.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: