Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ReclaimPolicy in StorageClass #352

Closed
wongma7 opened this issue Jul 12, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

ReclaimPolicy in StorageClass #352

wongma7 opened this issue Jul 12, 2017 · 7 comments
Assignees
@wongma7
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status
Milestone
v1.8

Comments

@wongma7
Copy link
Contributor

wongma7 commented Jul 12, 2017 •
edited by saad-ali
Loading

Feature Description

  • One-line feature description (can be used as a release note): Allow configuration of dynamically provisioned PVs' reclaim policies (Delete or Retain) via StorageClass
  • Primary contact (assignee): @wongma7
  • Responsible SIGs: Storage
  • Design proposal link (community repo): Allow configuration of reclaim policy in StorageClass kubernetes#38192
  • Reviewer(s) - (for LGTM) recommend having 2+ reviewers (at least one from code-area OWNERS file) agreed to review. Reviewers from multiple companies preferred:
    @jeffvance
  • Approver (likely from SIG/area to which feature belongs):
    @saad-ali
  • Feature target (which target equals to which milestone):
    • Beta release target (1.8)
    • Stable release target (1.9)
@saad-ali saad-ali added this to the 1.8 milestone Jul 12, 2017
@saad-ali
Copy link
Member

CC @kubernetes/sig-storage-feature-requests

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels Jul 12, 2017
@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi added the stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status label Jul 25, 2017
@wongma7 wongma7 mentioned this issue Aug 23, 2017
Merged
@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

@wongma7 @saad-ali any updates for 1.8? Is this feature still on track for the release?

@wongma7
Copy link
Contributor Author

wongma7 commented Sep 5, 2017

@idvoretskyi yes, code is done and docs need tech review kubernetes/website#5171

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

Prevent issues from auto-closing with an /lifecycle frozen comment.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 4, 2018
@jsafrane
Copy link
Member

jsafrane commented Jan 5, 2018

@wongma7, isn't this implemented and GA in 1.9?

@wongma7
Copy link
Contributor Author

wongma7 commented Jan 11, 2018

@jsafrane yes, was beta in 1.8 and should require no code/doc changes to move to GA in 1.9

@jsafrane
Copy link
Member

/close

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@wongma7 wongma7

Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.8
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@idvoretskyi @jsafrane @saad-ali @wongma7 @k8s-ci-robot @fejta-bot