Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

update CAPI to v1.3.0 and bump k8s versions and public k8s registry #773

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 6, 2022
Merged

update CAPI to v1.3.0 and bump k8s versions and public k8s registry #773

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 6, 2022

Conversation

cpanato
Copy link
Member

@cpanato cpanato commented Dec 4, 2022

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

  • update CAPI to v1.3.0 and bump k8s versions
  • use registry.k8s.io instead of us.gcr.io/k8s-artifacts-prod

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests

Release note:

- update CAPI to v1.3.0 and bump k8s versions
- use registry.k8s.io instead of us.gcr.io/k8s-artifacts-prod

@cpanato
update CAPI to v1.3.0 and bump k8s versions
a566631 
Signed-off-by: cpanato <ctadeu@gmail.com>
@cpanato
use registry.k8s.io instead of us.gcr.io/k8s-artifacts-prod
f593651 
Signed-off-by: cpanato <ctadeu@gmail.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels Dec 4, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Dec 4, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 4, 2022
@cpanato
Copy link
Member Author

cpanato commented Dec 4, 2022

/hold for non required tests

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 4, 2022
@cpanato
Copy link
Member Author

cpanato commented Dec 4, 2022

/test ls

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cpanato: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-build
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-e2e-test
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-make
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-test
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-apidiff
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-capi-e2e
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-conformance
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-conformance-ci-artifacts
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-coverage
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-e2e-workload-upgrade

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-apidiff
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-build
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-e2e-test
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-make
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-test
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-verify

In response to this:

/test ls

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@cpanato
Copy link
Member Author

cpanato commented Dec 4, 2022

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-e2e-workload-upgrade

@cpanato
Copy link
Member Author

cpanato commented Dec 5, 2022

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-capi-e2e
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-conformance
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-conformance-ci-artifacts

@cpanato
Copy link
Member Author

cpanato commented Dec 6, 2022

/assign @richardcase @dims

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 6, 2022
@cpanato
Copy link
Member Author

cpanato commented Dec 6, 2022

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 6, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 0fcdf67 into kubernetes-sigs:main Dec 6, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.1.0 milestone Dec 6, 2022
@cpanato cpanato deleted the updates branch December 8, 2022 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@CecileRobertMichon CecileRobertMichon Awaiting requested review from CecileRobertMichon

@dims dims Awaiting requested review from dims

Assignees

@dims dims

@richardcase richardcase

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.1.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@cpanato @k8s-ci-robot @richardcase @dims