Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why align the mean ±3× standard deviation of RGB scores with the mean ±3× standard deviation of SDF scores? #12

Open
limaodaxia opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@limaodaxia
Copy link

limaodaxia commented Feb 23, 2024

To calibrate the distributions of scores,
we align the mean ±3× standard deviation of RGB scores
with the mean ±3× standard deviation of SDF scores by
applying an affine transformation to the RGB scores.

Hello @jayliu0313 , where you got this idea?

@jayliu0313
Copy link
Owner

Due to the significant numerical gap between these the image feature and the SDF feature, we use statistical methods to align them, ensuring that scoring is appropriate between them.

@limaodaxia
Copy link
Author

for L in range(sdf_c.shape[0]):
    tmp_map[index[L]] = sdf_c[L]
    if(s_map[index[L]] == 0) or (s_map[index[L]] > sdf_c[L]):
        s_map[index[L]] = sdf_c[L]

when get the score map of sdf, why use the min val of distance to update the map?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants