Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 18, 2020. It is now read-only.

Use recommended labels #113

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 22, 2019
Merged

Use recommended labels #113

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 22, 2019

Conversation

naseemkullah
Copy link
Member

Which problem is this PR solving?

Not a problem per se, but using standards helps everybody in the long run.

Short description of the changes

Using recommended labels as per https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/overview/working-with-objects/common-labels/

If approved I will go on to make a similar change to the incubating helm chart.

PS Also updated some images.

TIA

Signed-off-by: Naseem Ullah <naseemkullah@gmail.com>
@jpkrohling
Copy link
Collaborator

We had a very similar PR for the Operator: jaegertracing/jaeger-operator#172

It would be nice to be consistent here, especially regarding backwards compatibility.

Signed-off-by: Naseem Ullah <naseemkullah@gmail.com>
@naseemkullah
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @jpkrohling , I've added back the original app label for backwards compatibility. Please let me know if this will suffice.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jpkrohling jpkrohling left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. The build is failing due to #114, so, once that one is merged, please rebase this PR and push an update, so that Travis can run run the tests incorporating your changes.

@naseemkullah
Copy link
Member Author

Great, thanks @jpkrohling !

@naseemkullah
Copy link
Member Author

bump

@jpkrohling jpkrohling merged commit 39dc136 into jaegertracing:master Feb 22, 2019
@jpkrohling
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for reminding me and thanks for your contribution!

@naseemkullah
Copy link
Member Author

My pleasure!

@naseemkullah naseemkullah deleted the recommended-labels branch February 22, 2019 12:53
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants