Is there a better way to organize this?

[j0hnm4r5]

The current method is a little unwieldy and primarily consists of a massive "Creative Technology" section and a bunch of smaller adjacent ones (like for Museums, Art Collectives, Architecture firms, etc.).

Is there a better way to organize all this? Tags?

[j0hnm4r5]

@JohnENoonan if you have any thoughts, I'd love to hear them.

[raphdag01]

Hello, why not separate medium makers (technologists) from content producers (writers, directors) ?
Then, filter by technology and application fields (museum, theatre, web, etc..) ?

[raphdag01]

BTW I would like to add my studio : we imagine and engineer, from blue sky to premiere day, live immersive experiences (Show, Theatre, Retail, Hotel, Exhibitions, Theme Parks). But I really don't get the way to suggest an update !

[j0hnm4r5]

Can you give me an example of a few places that might fall into each side of that, from the current list?

[j0hnm4r5]

@raphdag01 you can add a new submission by adding a new object in the appropriate section of index.ts and submitting it as a PR. Or alternatively submit an issue with all the necessary info and I will add it when I get the chance.

[raphdag01]

For example : Adirondack is a Design & Build company. They help in making the IP live. But they don't write the IP. On the other hand, Dera Lee has a strong value proposition in writing the narrative. The breakdown of the list could also be derivated from the methodolgy of design : concept, schematic, production, fabrication, commissionning, operation.

[EdwardDeaver]

Hi John,
I'm not sure about the subcategories but I think one thing could be making the locations plain text so CMD+F/Control+F can search the page.

[j0hnm4r5]

Oh that's a great callout; I didn't realize those SVGs had broken that. I'll make that update real quick.

[EdwardDeaver]

Thank you!

[j0hnm4r5]

All done. Not as pretty, but a lot more useful.