-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 359
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: Allow caching with the standalone instrument command #1203
Comments
I'm not strictly opposed to this idea but we'd need to be sure that any options which can alter results (such as |
I've put up the start of a PR, it allows the |
I wonder if we add Probably wouldn't hurt to also add |
Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward? This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
bump. Still relevant, from memory this needs work to finish. |
Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward? This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
bump, Still relevant, I'll take another look when there's some maintainer interest |
Problem
The
nyc instrument
command could benefit from using a cache. This would speed up subsequent runs ofnyc instrument
that were using the same cache and be a big benefit to streaming instrumentation implementations.Proposal
Add the caching options from the standard nyc command to
nyc instrument
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: