Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update hermes tx raw commands to drop the raw subcommand #2315

Closed
5 tasks
ljoss17 opened this issue Jun 17, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2404
Closed
5 tasks

Update hermes tx raw commands to drop the raw subcommand #2315

ljoss17 opened this issue Jun 17, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2404
Milestone

Comments

@ljoss17
Copy link
Contributor

ljoss17 commented Jun 17, 2022

Summary

Update the commands hermes tx raw in order to drop the raw subcommand.

Problem Definition

Following discussion #2306 (comment) the hermes tx raw commands would be clear even after dropping the raw, so having hermes tx <subcommand>.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Remove raw from Hermes commands:
    • hermes tx raw chan-close-confirm
    • hermes tx raw chan-close-init
    • hermes tx raw chan-open-ack
    • hermes tx raw chan-open-confirm
    • hermes tx raw chan-open-init
    • hermes tx raw chan-open-try
    • hermes tx raw conn-ack
    • hermes tx raw conn-confirm
    • hermes tx raw conn-init
    • hermes tx raw conn-try
    • hermes tx raw create-client
    • hermes tx raw ft-transfer
    • hermes tx raw packet-ack
    • hermes tx raw packet-recv
    • hermes tx raw update-client
    • hermes tx raw upgrade-chain
    • hermes tx raw upgrade-client
    • hermes tx raw upgrade-clients

For Admin Use

  • Not duplicate issue
  • Appropriate labels applied
  • Appropriate milestone (priority) applied
  • Appropriate contributors tagged
  • Contributor assigned/self-assigned
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Status: Closed
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants