Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Questions about QFL #36

Open
jacksonsc007 opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Questions about QFL #36

jacksonsc007 opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@jacksonsc007
Copy link

jacksonsc007 commented Jul 13, 2022

Hi, thanks a lot for your great work and I am sorry to bother you but there is a question that nags me a lot.
As mentioned in your paper, the supervision of the localization quality estimation is currently assigned for positive samples only which is unreliable as negatives may get chances to have uncontrollably higher quality predictions.
Merging quality prediction into classification score is fantastic. But here is the thing: Have your tried to keep the quality branch and train it with the inclusion of negative samples with proposed QFL?
I've tried this in FCOS and it turned out that centerness predictions for positive sample in minival were pretty bad. And I've taken those super parameters like initial bias prior for centerness branch into consideration but results were always bad.
Hope to hear your insights.
Thanks again.
@implus

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant