Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use brc20_total_balances table when inserting new transfer #321

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2024

Conversation

rafaelcr
Copy link
Collaborator

@rafaelcr rafaelcr commented Mar 7, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Vercel deployment URL: https://ordinals-8590duh0q-blockstack.vercel.app 🚀

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.50%. Comparing base (66ba744) to head (ce154d1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #321      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.51%   96.50%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          65       65              
  Lines        6391     6384       -7     
  Branches      542      542              
==========================================
- Hits         6168     6161       -7     
  Misses        221      221              
  Partials        2        2              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rafaelcr rafaelcr changed the base branch from master to beta March 7, 2024 14:21
@rafaelcr rafaelcr merged commit 925fb0e into beta Mar 7, 2024
9 checks passed
@rafaelcr rafaelcr deleted the fix/brc20-transfer-index branch March 7, 2024 14:22
blockstack-devops pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2024
## [3.0.2-beta.1](v3.0.1...v3.0.2-beta.1) (2024-03-07)

### Bug Fixes

* use brc20_total_balances table when inserting new transfer ([#321](#321)) ([925fb0e](925fb0e))
@blockstack-devops
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.0.2-beta.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

blockstack-devops pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2024
## [3.1.0](v3.0.1...v3.1.0) (2024-04-23)

### Features

* support self minted 5-byte wide BRC-20 tokens ([#338](#338)) ([60f46d3](60f46d3))

### Bug Fixes

* calculate transfer type correctly upon reveal ([#326](#326)) ([6c4c54b](6c4c54b))
* check only the first blessed inscription in next block on gap detection ([#325](#325)) ([9cad6c1](9cad6c1))
* filter correct content types for brc20 ([#323](#323)) ([4d52b48](4d52b48))
* ignore spent as fee on gap check ([#328](#328)) ([a1277cf](a1277cf))
* remove gap detection ([#330](#330)) ([040ee04](040ee04))
* use brc20_total_balances table when inserting new transfer ([#321](#321)) ([925fb0e](925fb0e))
@blockstack-devops
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.1.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants