Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow for incorporating information on informal settlements #232

Open
carlhiggs opened this issue Mar 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Allow for incorporating information on informal settlements #232

carlhiggs opened this issue Mar 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
user process to document A process to be conducted by users that our documentation should detail

Comments

@carlhiggs
Copy link
Collaborator

For many cites and regions informal settlements are important for consideration: potentially densely populated, these are locations home to populations who may be most vulnerable to urban inequities. They may also be excluded from census data, and so possibly not included in population estimates. We should find a way to allow for sensitivity analysis of population data to compare it with data on location of informal settlements where available. This could help highlight inequities in population data, and potential limitations in some urban indicators for population access to healthy urban environments. If such limitations were identified, we might be able to work towards methods to mitigate these.

This issue is a placeholder for this intent.

@carlhiggs carlhiggs added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 29, 2023
@carlhiggs carlhiggs added user process to document A process to be conducted by users that our documentation should detail and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Jun 20, 2023
@carlhiggs
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Indirectly, this might now be possible via #295 , or configuring an alternative population data grid -- ie. if one had a prepared dataset that was known to account for informal settlements (that could perhaps be overlooked in larger modelled data relying on census estimates, like GHS-POP, our default), then this could be substituted for the global data, and optionally the results compared as a sensitivity analysis.

As this is now technically possible I will consider this issue technically resolved. It is an important consideration however, so I will change its tag from 'enhancement' to 'user process to document'. It will be great to include some guidance on doing this in our instructional materials.

@carlhiggs
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Some resources that could help inform approaches to deal with this:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
user process to document A process to be conducted by users that our documentation should detail
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant