Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Capability to include extension from source on the local machine #9

Open
bandorko opened this issue Sep 28, 2023 · 3 comments
Open
Labels
feature Feature Request postponed Implementation postponed

Comments

@bandorko
Copy link
Contributor

First of all: I realy like this project. Thx @szkiba

I am experimenting with it, and try to combine with xk6-g0 to write load test in go. It would be really useful, if I could overwrite an automatically discovered extension (e.g.: when I try to modify something on xk6-g0) or if I could include an officially not supported (not in the k6 extension registry) extension.
Due to lack of this option, I had to fallback to xk6.

@szkiba szkiba added the feature Feature Request label Sep 29, 2023
@szkiba szkiba changed the title [Feature] Capability to include extension from source on the local machine Capability to include extension from source on the local machine Sep 29, 2023
@szkiba
Copy link
Collaborator

szkiba commented Sep 29, 2023

Hi @bandorko , Thanks for the feedback and the feature suggestion.
The primary users of k6x are k6 users. Building from local sources is basically k6 extension developer support, so it is outside the scope of k6x.

Support for unregistered extensions (for example, extensions intended for internal use) is not a top priority, but it is possible that it will be added to the roadmap. (Actually, I already implemented it once, but deleted it because it was a bit confusing)

@szkiba szkiba added the postponed Implementation postponed label Sep 29, 2023
@szkiba
Copy link
Collaborator

szkiba commented Oct 9, 2023

Hi @bandorko , #19 will solve (partially) this issue...

@szkiba
Copy link
Collaborator

szkiba commented Oct 9, 2023

Hi @bandorko , #21 will solve the another part of this issue, so the #19 and #21 will solve this issue :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Feature Request postponed Implementation postponed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants