Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Share memory (array) sub-system API and optional tight integration with numpy #339

Open
2 of 14 tasks
goodboy opened this issue Oct 17, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
2 of 14 tasks
Labels
api examples experiment Exploratory design and testing help wanted Extra attention is needed streaming testing

Comments

@goodboy
Copy link
Owner

goodboy commented Oct 17, 2022

First draft justifications and theoretical underpinning

The main focus of this effort is to provide a simple and low(er) level API for the management of shared memory array/buffers for the purposes of real-time processing.

By leveraging the semantics and constraints of structured concurrency, we can provide an API that avoids the presence of data races in the context of concurrent stream and signal processing and the resource management of shared data structures without the need for special additional "shared resource subsystems" such as the stdlib's ResourceTracker or the public APIs for SharedMemoryManager.

In an SC multi-processing system (which tractor is) such auxiliary subsystems are simply unrequired since the lifetime management of processes and their scheduled tasks are already explicitly defined through nursery constructs 🏄🏼

As the most obvious example, a very simple set of premises provided by our SC actors enables a data race free shm management system without the need for any "special" resource tracking:

  • a parent actor is spawned and allocates a shared memory buffer which it, and it alone is given write access
  • the parent spawns (multiple) subactor(s) which are given read-only access to the shm

=> due to no child actor being able to outlive its parent, the configuration of processes and the shm buffer already implicitly implements a readers-writer lock; there is zero concern for data races during shm segment management since no child can be left reading after the resource has been unlinked. Further, no special tracking of the shm needs to be conducted as long as the parent/alocator de-allocates the segment on exit.


Outstanding bug-issues to be resolved for this implementation

There is a slew of related piker issues that drive the need to better formalize this API:


Motivating feature enhancements


Near-term ToDo list for first draft landing as a documented public API:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api examples experiment Exploratory design and testing help wanted Extra attention is needed streaming testing
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant