Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Launch Form Msgpack IDL Supporting #888

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

lyonlu13
Copy link
Contributor

@lyonlu13 lyonlu13 commented Oct 14, 2024

TL;DR

Add msgpack IDL support for the launch form, including input displaying and relaunch input recovering.
image
image
Test case: hhttps://localhost.dogfood.cloud-staging.union.ai:8080/console/projects/flytesnacks/domains/development/executions/acj8vfbt8722wg4q46nv

Type

  • Bug Fix
  • Feature
  • Plugin

ursucarina
ursucarina previously approved these changes Oct 16, 2024
Signed-off-by: Lyon Lu <lyon@union.ai>
Signed-off-by: Lyon Lu <lyon@union.ai>
Signed-off-by: Lyon Lu <lyon@union.ai>
lyonlu13 and others added 3 commits October 18, 2024 04:23
Signed-off-by: Lyon Lu <lyon@union.ai>
Signed-off-by: Lyon Lu <lyon@union.ai>
Signed-off-by: Carina Ursu <carina@union.ai>
@ursucarina ursucarina enabled auto-merge (squash) October 17, 2024 20:57
@ursucarina ursucarina changed the title Launch Form Msgpack IDL Supporting feat: Launch Form Msgpack IDL Supporting Oct 17, 2024
@ursucarina ursucarina enabled auto-merge (squash) October 17, 2024 21:23
@ursucarina ursucarina merged commit d1dc889 into flyteorg:master Oct 17, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
Copy link

welcome bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉

@flyte-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.18.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

}

// unsupported binary type, it might be temporary
return '';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason not to stringify binary.value and return that instead?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants