Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EIP-1559 (Fee market change) Tracking & Discussion Issue #17

Closed
holgerd77 opened this issue May 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

EIP-1559 (Fee market change) Tracking & Discussion Issue #17

holgerd77 opened this issue May 29, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@holgerd77
Copy link
Collaborator

holgerd77 commented May 29, 2020

And another strategy issue: EIP-1559 with a proposal for a changed gas fee market model is gaining more and more traction.

Just dropping this here. We might want to see if we want to engage more here. Eventually it is also time to think about starting on implementations (someone might want to write down here on the potential changes needed respectively libraries touched), an estimated (super-unoffical) timeline here is a by-year-end mainnet adoption.

Some references:

@jochem-brouwer jochem-brouwer changed the title EIP-1159 (Fee market change) Tracking & Discussion Issue EIP-1559 (Fee market change) Tracking & Discussion Issue Oct 1, 2020
@jochem-brouwer
Copy link
Member

General comment here: I think the focus for now should be to get client/vm ready to support each other, so we can implement a sync on the client (probably full sync first as this is the "easiest" here IMO). As a side project we can slowly start to implement this EIP (but one with rather high priority). It would be great to get the client ready so we can participate in testnets and thus also participate in a testnet for EIP 1559 which I assume is very likely to happen.

@holgerd77
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Not used and outdated, will close.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants