Use an array type for list view response schemas #6849
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is the first part of encode#6846. Previously, the response schema for list views was an object representing a single item. However, list views return a list of items, and hence it should be an array. Further work will need to be done to support how pagination classes modify list responses. There should be no change for views not determined to be list views.
carltongibson
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refs #6846
Description
This is the first part of #6846.
Previously, the response schema for list views was an object representing a single item. However, list views return a list of items, and hence it should be an array.
Further work will need to be done to support how pagination classes modify list responses.
There should be no change for views not determined to be list views.
I also slightly refactored the logic to get a serialiser instance in
AutoSchemaso that it's shared between_get_request_body()and_get_responses().I'd recommend looking at the two commits separately.