Iox #556 release 1.0 preparation

[dkroenke]

Pre-Review Checklist for the PR Author

1. Code follows the coding style of CONTRIBUTING.md
2. Tests follow the best practice for testing
3. Branch follows the naming format (iox-#123-this-is-a-branch)
4. Commits messages are according to this guideline
   • Commit messages have the issue ID (iox-#123 commit text)
   • Commit messages are signed (git commit -s)
   • Commit author matches Eclipse Contributor Agreement (and ECA is signed)
5. Update the PR title
   • Follow the same conventions as for commit messages
   • Link to the relevant issue
6. Relevant issues are linked
7. Add sensible notes for the reviewer
8. All checks have passed (except task-list-completed)
9. Assign PR to reviewer

Notes for Reviewer

This PR prepare some formal aspects for the upcoming 1.0 release.
Additonally a release build job is added for deploying a debian package.

Checklist for the PR Reviewer

• Commits are properly organized and messages are according to the guideline
• Code according to our coding style and naming conventions
• Unit tests have been written for new behavior
• Public API changes are documented via doxygen
• Copyright owner are updated in the changed files
• PR title describes the changes

Post-review Checklist for the PR Author

1. All open points are addressed and tracked via issues

References

• Closes iceoryx 1.0, Eclipse release preparation #556

[elBoberido]

I didn't do a thorough review, just skimmed over some files

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #593 (a9c8930) into master (45a3f41) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #593      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.94%   73.89%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         318      318              
  Lines       11106    11110       +4     
  Branches     1955     1955              
==========================================
- Hits         8212     8210       -2     
- Misses       2126     2133       +7     
+ Partials      768      767       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	73.85% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
unittests_timing	31.59% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
..._utils/source/posix_wrapper/unix_domain_socket.cpp	56.68% <0.00%> (-1.85%)	⬇️
...nclude/iceoryx_utils/internal/cxx/forward_list.inl	89.03% <0.00%> (-0.79%)	⬇️
..._utils/include/iceoryx_utils/internal/cxx/list.inl	90.03% <0.00%> (-0.70%)	⬇️
...ils/include/iceoryx_utils/internal/cxx/smart_c.inl	90.62% <0.00%> (+3.12%)	⬆️

[elBoberido]

looked only at the cmake version stuff

[elBoberido]

I prefer IOX over a ICEORYX prefix since it's less to type. We should try to be consistent though. In our C++ codebase we use iox and in cmake we used ICEORYX. Maybe we should also switch in cmake completely to IOX