Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce ruff to ci #2051

Merged
merged 61 commits into from
Apr 8, 2024
Merged

Introduce ruff to ci #2051

merged 61 commits into from
Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

Kakadus
Copy link
Collaborator

@Kakadus Kakadus commented Oct 23, 2023

No description provided.

@Kakadus Kakadus changed the title New ruff New ruff first draft Oct 23, 2023
@Kakadus Kakadus marked this pull request as draft October 23, 2023 22:44
evap/locale/de/formats.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Kakadus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Kakadus commented Nov 13, 2023

rebased and cleaned the commits a bit. #2063 and #2064 are no longer part of this

pyproject.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pyproject.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pyproject.toml Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@richardebeling richardebeling left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks :)

Copy link
Member

@niklasmohrin niklasmohrin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The switch from rule names to numbers for noqa and the explicit __all__ is a bit sad, but maybe ruff will figure it out in the future. Overall very nice!

evap/results/exporters.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@Kakadus Kakadus merged commit 90702c3 into e-valuation:main Apr 8, 2024
10 checks passed
@Kakadus Kakadus deleted the ruff branch April 8, 2024 19:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants