Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce MyPy #1688

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 17, 2022
Merged

Introduce MyPy #1688

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 17, 2022

Conversation

niklasmohrin
Copy link
Member

Closes #1653

As you can see, there are some places that need a type: ignore, but overall I was surprised how little I had to change to make mypy pass. It seems to handle the untyped code fairly well.

How do you all feel about static type checking?

Copy link
Member

@richardebeling richardebeling left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good stuff, looks nice!

@niklasmohrin niklasmohrin changed the title This MyPy is now OurPy Introduce MyPy Jan 17, 2022
@niklasmohrin niklasmohrin merged commit b14d0e3 into e-valuation:main Jan 17, 2022
@niklasmohrin niklasmohrin deleted the checkthisout branch January 17, 2022 18:08
niklasmohrin added a commit to niklasmohrin/EvaP that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2022
niklasmohrin added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Static type checking for Python
2 participants