Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Djanicek/infraeng 487/circle test runner #8977

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

djanicekpach
Copy link
Contributor

@djanicekpach djanicekpach commented Mar 8, 2024

Description

INFRAENG-487

Circle-ci lets us re-run failed tests individually if we use the circle ci runner instead of splitting and running separately.
https://circleci.com/docs/rerun-failed-tests/

This makes it faster and cheaper to re-run failures on circle-ci since individual tests can be re-run instead of whole jobs.

Test Plan

pipeline passed and all the E2E tests took the same amount of time. Spot checking most of them, they all ran the same number of tests as main.

https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/determined-ai/determined/52143/workflows/311b97d9-4e74-4c18-90c2-f03abd7f3cf6/jobs/2331410

We'll have to be careful of long-running nightly e2e. I'm running a sample to insure they work. https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/determined-ai/determined/52143/workflows/2e6ceb8a-4d72-4ae3-9f3c-73e85358f7ee

Checklist

  • Changes have been manually QA'd
  • User-facing API changes need the "User-facing API Change" label.
  • Release notes should be added as a separate file under docs/release-notes/.
    See Release Note for details.
  • Licenses should be included for new code which was copied and/or modified from any external code.

@djanicekpach djanicekpach requested a review from a team as a code owner March 8, 2024 16:21
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Mar 8, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Deploy Preview for determined-ui canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 28cd47e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/determined-ui/deploys/65f1c1ba864ccd0008766fbd

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 47.49%. Comparing base (4730d76) to head (28cd47e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8977   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   47.49%   47.49%           
=======================================
  Files        1168     1168           
  Lines      176315   176315           
  Branches     2353     2350    -3     
=======================================
  Hits        83732    83732           
  Misses      92425    92425           
  Partials      158      158           
Flag Coverage Δ
backend 42.58% <ø> (ø)
harness 64.00% <ø> (ø)
web 42.83% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@dannysauer dannysauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable

@djanicekpach djanicekpach force-pushed the djanicek/infraeng-487/circle-test-runner branch from 99b37b7 to 053390a Compare March 12, 2024 14:21
Copy link
Contributor

@JComins000 JComins000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this looks good. i'd like to find a way to run a single test manually as well

@djanicekpach djanicekpach force-pushed the djanicek/infraeng-487/circle-test-runner branch from 053390a to 28cd47e Compare March 13, 2024 15:09
@djanicekpach djanicekpach merged commit 978a02e into main Mar 13, 2024
77 of 95 checks passed
@djanicekpach djanicekpach deleted the djanicek/infraeng-487/circle-test-runner branch March 13, 2024 15:33
maxrussell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
* use circle test runner instead of splitter

* fix xargs syntax
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants