Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Canonicalized Media Types #2705

Open
Racer159 opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Canonicalized Media Types #2705

Racer159 opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement ✨ New feature or request ga Issues tracking toward Zarf 1.0

Comments

@Racer159
Copy link
Contributor

Racer159 commented Jul 9, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Now that Zarf has been donated it would be nice to have canonicalized media types (either accepting the existing ones or changing to openssf) to add logic on Zarf package handling (particularly OCI packages) to other projects.

Describe the solution you'd like

Zarf Config and Layer media types to be documented / supported for incorporation in other projects (i.e. Renovate, GitLab, etc).

Describe alternatives you've considered

We could push these projects to move away from media types (since by the newer OCI specifications these could be anything) but there are cases where specific annotations or handling may want to be implemented regardless.

Additional context

Some projects handle OCI artifacts only for specific media types and having a canonical media type for Zarf would allow this to be PRed into these projects.

@Racer159 Racer159 added the enhancement ✨ New feature or request label Jul 9, 2024
@AustinAbro321 AustinAbro321 added the ga Issues tracking toward Zarf 1.0 label Aug 8, 2024
@AustinAbro321
Copy link
Contributor

@salaxander @schristoff did we ever decide on this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement ✨ New feature or request ga Issues tracking toward Zarf 1.0
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants