fix bitmask doc on RelationFilter (#180)

dcSpark · Mar 26, 2024 · a9244a5 · a9244a5
1 parent e9b4668
commit a9244a5
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/docs/bin/openapi.json b/docs/bin/openapi.json
@@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@
                 "type": "number",
                 "format": "double",
                 "example": 255,
-                "description": "Filter which uses of the address are considered relevant for the query.\n\nThis is a bitmask, so you can combine multiple options\nex: `RelationFilterType.Input & RelationFilterType.Output`\n\nNote: relations only apply to credentials and not to full bech32 addresses",
+                "description": "Filter which uses of the address are considered relevant for the query.\n\nThis is a bitmask, so you can combine multiple options\nex: `RelationFilterType.Input | RelationFilterType.Output`\n\nNote: relations only apply to credentials and not to full bech32 addresses",
                 "pattern": "([01]?[0-9]?[0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])"
             },
             "TransactionHistoryRequest": {

diff --git a/webserver/shared/models/common.ts b/webserver/shared/models/common.ts
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ import { AssetName, PolicyId } from "./PolicyIdAssetMap";
  * Filter which uses of the address are considered relevant for the query.
  *
  * This is a bitmask, so you can combine multiple options
- * ex: `RelationFilterType.Input & RelationFilterType.Output`
+ * ex: `RelationFilterType.Input | RelationFilterType.Output`
  *
  * Note: relations only apply to credentials and not to full bech32 addresses
  * @pattern ([01]?[0-9]?[0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])