Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix spark cluster start mechanism and add extra dev requirements #986

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2024

Conversation

colin-rogers-dbt
Copy link
Contributor

resolves #
docs dbt-labs/docs.getdbt.com/#

Problem

Solution

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
  • I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
  • This PR has no interface changes (e.g. macros, cli, logs, json artifacts, config files, adapter interface, etc) or this PR has already received feedback and approval from Product or DX

@colin-rogers-dbt colin-rogers-dbt requested a review from a team as a code owner February 20, 2024 05:40
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label Feb 20, 2024
@colin-rogers-dbt colin-rogers-dbt added Skip Changelog Skips GHA to check for changelog file and removed cla:yes labels Feb 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your pull request! We could not find a changelog entry for this change. For details on how to document a change, see the dbt-spark contributing guide.

.with_exec(["pip", "install", "-e", "."])
)

# install local test changes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Separating these out reduces the frequency of cache invalidation

if "databricks" in profile_type:
_wait_for_databricks_cluster(project)

yield 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Out of curiosity, why yield 1 instead of just yield?

@mikealfare
Copy link
Contributor

Since we're on GHA with this now, should we remove the CircleCI Pipeline check?

@colin-rogers-dbt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Since we're on GHA with this now, should we remove the CircleCI Pipeline check?

I thought we had but it seems to keep coming back

@colin-rogers-dbt colin-rogers-dbt merged commit 613fa58 into main Feb 20, 2024
25 of 28 checks passed
@colin-rogers-dbt colin-rogers-dbt deleted the fixDBXHttpTests branch February 20, 2024 15:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Skip Changelog Skips GHA to check for changelog file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants