Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AI chatbot taken down after it gives ‘harmful advice’ to those with eating disorders #65

Open
andy-mayne opened this issue Jun 20, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@andy-mayne
Copy link

https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/ai-eating-disorder-harmful-advice-b2349499.html

@KOLANICH
Copy link

KOLANICH commented Jun 20, 2023

I don't think any malfunctioning AI fits here. Of course ones who want to treat their disorders should consult someone who is competent in the topic or learn themselves, not just rely on a bot. I am pretty sure that bots giving health advice come with warnings encouraging users to do that. It is also not a reason not to use AI to solve such problems. In fact more a problem important, more it is reasonable to make the consulting on it available to the everyone, and applying AI increases availability.

@andy-mayne
Copy link
Author

I think the angle I was coming from was that the company made all its employees redundant and replaced them with an AI bot that was obviously poorly trained for the use case. If you are contacting a dedicated healthcare service, like the national eating disorder association in this example, you expect that the service you are contacting will have appropriate safe guards in place and give you at least safe advice, and whilst you can put a disclaimer saying that you should not solely rely on it, we are talking about clinically vulnerable people who may not use that information correctly.

@bnord
Copy link

bnord commented Jun 21, 2023

Using AI tools that are not interpretable or explainable for this kind of health care is super dangerous. While it may expand care for some, it increases health risk for others.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants