We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
情况是这样,如果GT模型h和预测模型p分辨率差很多,比如GT模型一般可以用扫描仪获得,顶点数远远大于预测的模板模型。看论文bICP应该查找的也是一对一的点对,也就是最终计算的点对数是预测模板p的个数,这种评价方法很正确。我想请问,如果这个时候要用gICP,计算p->h方向比h->p方向应该更能反应真实的误差吧?我理解h->p方向GT模型h上会有很多点找到了预测模型p上面的同一点。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
情况是这样,如果GT模型h和预测模型p分辨率差很多,比如GT模型一般可以用扫描仪获得,顶点数远远大于预测的模板模型。看论文bICP应该查找的也是一对一的点对,也就是最终计算的点对数是预测模板p的个数,这种评价方法很正确。我想请问,如果这个时候要用gICP,计算p->h方向比h->p方向应该更能反应真实的误差吧?我理解h->p方向GT模型h上会有很多点找到了预测模型p上面的同一点。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: