Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include generic in java type definition #372

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 10, 2021
Merged

Include generic in java type definition #372

merged 9 commits into from
Dec 10, 2021

Conversation

AndreasArvidsson
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@AndreasArvidsson AndreasArvidsson added this to the 0.24.0 milestone Dec 9, 2021
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
languageId: java
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not worth rewriting all these tests, but I thought we had aligned on "clear" instead of "take" to make these tests easier to read. Makes it a bit painful having to manually count offsets to figure out what the test is doing

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're completely correct.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fwiw I'm planning a rework of the tests to make modifier tests clearer / more compact, and then the "clear" / "take" thing won't matter. Not sure if I've already filed an issue but I will at some point

Copy link
Member Author

@AndreasArvidsson AndreasArvidsson Dec 9, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that sounds really useful

@pokey pokey merged commit 0712ee8 into main Dec 10, 2021
@pokey pokey deleted the java_generic branch December 10, 2021 10:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants