Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(server): wrong function comments #21017

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

lfz941
Copy link
Contributor

@lfz941 lfz941 commented Jul 22, 2024

Description

Related to #19585.

These were introduced by PR #20989

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation Improvements
    • Updated method name and documentation for RegisterSnapshotExtensions to enhance clarity regarding its functionality.
    • Corrected casing in the documentation for the UnmarshalSubConfig function for consistency with its signature.

@lfz941 lfz941 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 22, 2024 09:58
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 22, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes introduced in this diff focus on improving the clarity and consistency of method names and documentation within the codebase. Specifically, the RegisterExtensions method has been renamed to RegisterSnapshotExtensions to more accurately reflect its functionality related to snapshot management. Additionally, the documentation for the UnmarshalSubConfig function has been updated for consistency with the actual function naming. These modifications aim to enhance the user experience by ensuring that method names and documentation are aligned.

Changes

Files Change Summary
server/v2/cometbft/abci.go Renamed RegisterExtensions to RegisterSnapshotExtensions in the Consensus class to clarify its purpose related to snapshot management.
server/v2/config.go Updated function documentation to correct casing from UnmarshalSubconfig to UnmarshalSubConfig, ensuring consistency with the actual function signature.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt changed the title fix(server): wrong function comments chore(server): wrong function comments Jul 22, 2024
@julienrbrt julienrbrt changed the title chore(server): wrong function comments docs(server): wrong function comments Jul 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d6f97e and d4c2af1.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • server/v2/cometbft/abci.go (1 hunks)
  • server/v2/config.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • server/v2/cometbft/abci.go
  • server/v2/config.go

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 22, 2024
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit 8fe0b22 Jul 22, 2024
74 of 76 checks passed
alpe added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2024
* main: (48 commits)
  build(deps): add missing replaces and remove unnecessary ones (#21033)
  build(deps): Bump bufbuild/buf-setup-action from 1.34.0 to 1.35.0 (#21028)
  chore: fix some comments for struct field (#21027)
  chore(x): replace `fmt.Errorf` without parameters with `errors.New` (#21032)
  chore: fix errors reported by running `make lint` (#21015)
  ci: skip spelling check in go.mod/go.sum (#21021)
  chore(all)!: use gogoproto/any instead of codec/types/any (#21013)
  chore(server/v2/cometbft): ensure consistent dash-case in app.toml (#21018)
  docs(server): wrong function comments (#21017)
  refactor(storev2): update snapshot manager and migration manager tests (#20441)
  feat(server/v2/cometbft): config (#20989)
  refactor: set `help` as default target of Makefile (#21011)
  fix(simapp): duplicated import (#21014)
  chore(docs): fix functions and struct comments (#21010)
  fix(simapp/v2): panic with testnet init-files command (#21012)
  fix: make help won't work (#21005)
  fix: NewIntegrationApp does not write default genesis to state (#21006)
  chore(x/staking,x/upgrade): replace `fmt.Errorf` without parameters with `errors.New` (#21004)
  chore: prepare depinject 1.0.0 (#21001)
  docs: Fix typos in RFC Creation Process (#20998)
  ...
@lfz941 lfz941 deleted the chore/fix-function-comments branch July 31, 2024 04:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants