Feature Request: Context Data for custom validations

[softwarerero]

It would be great if custom validations with refine or superRefine could access data that is given as a parameter to parse, parseAsync, safeParse or safeParseAsync.

Joi for example allows to give a context object as a second parameter to its validate function which then can be evaluated in custom rules.

[colinhacks]

Discussed extensively elsewhere: #84 #148

TLDR: Probably not happening any time soon I'm afraid

[fkrauthan]

I know this is currently closed but I would also love some way to pass context information to custom validators. For example, I want to validate duplicates but exclude the current object id (currently I have to add id as a field to my schema and then have to remove it again when saving the data in the database). Or for example, my validation might have stricter rules if it is an admin user vs a regular user.

Right now it seems like the only way is to add them to the actual schema, pass the data in and then remove it again from the schema before processing the safeParsed data (defeating slightly the idea behind safe parse in my opinion)

[jotatoledo]

The lack of this feature was a deal breaker for my use case - had to replace it with yup, which offers this function, and refactor.
Would be nice to see sometime in the future.